Legal Opinion

State v. Dorsey

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 2003No. 27373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

John M. Dorsey appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentence for trafficking in methamphetamine by manufacturing. Dorsey argues that the information was insufficient to give him notice of the charge against him, and that charging both manúfác-ture and attempted manufacture of methamphetamine, in the same count of the information, was improper and constituted grounds for dismissal. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Dorsey was charged with trafficking in methamphetamine by manufacturing, I.C. § 37~2732B(a)(3). The second amended information alleged that Dorsey “on or about…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. McMahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. GradyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. DarbinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. JeskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. Robert Michael WillistonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. JeskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API