Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1987No. 15703Published

1Opinion of the Court

731 P.2d 171 (1986)

112 Idaho 176

Michael ANDERSON, Plaintiff/Appellant/Cross-Respondent,

v.

CITY OF POCATELLO, a municipal corporation; Ron Black, individually and as a public officer of the City of Pocatello; and Bruce Gentillon individually and as a public officer of the City of Pocatello, Defendants/Respondents/Cross-Appellants.

No. 15703.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 29, 1986.

On Rehearing January 28, 1987.

Dan Edwards of Suiter, Edwards & Gere, Eagle, for plaintiff/appellant/cross-respondent.

Jesse C. Robison (argued) and L. Charles Johnson, of Johnson, Olson, Robison, Chartered & Pocatello, for…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Bakes; Concurrence · Bistline; Dissent; Concurrence · Shepard.

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API