Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1917No. Docket No. 85PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Selina I. Kinney presented her claim for compensation against the Cadillac Motor Car Company for the accidental death of her husband in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

Claimant’s decedent was employed by the Cadillac Motor Car Company at an average weekly wage of $12.98. Claimant was totally dependent upon deceased and entitled to compensation, if at all, at the rate of $6.49 per week for 300 weeks. Her decedent died March 21, 1916, from general septicaemia, resulting from an abrasion on his left thumb. The committee of arbitration declined to make an award. Its determination was reversed by the industrial accident board, which considered the testimony produced to the arbitration committee and some further testimony taken by depositions. It was found:

“(1)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reck v. WhittlesbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fitzgerald v. Lozier Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  2. Doherty v. Township of Grosse IsleMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Wilson v. Phœnix Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Larrabee's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  5. Hubbard v. Republic Motor Truck Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API