Legal Opinion · Dissent

Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Ujack

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1914No. Civil No. 1331Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Yavapai. Frank O. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Dissent

CUNNINGHAM, J.,

Dissenting in Part.—The appellant assigns as error the order overruling its pleas in abatement, the order overruling its general demurrer, the order overruling its special demurrer, the order sustaining plaintiff’s general demurrer to defendant’s plea in bar, and the order refusing a new trial because of said erroneous rulings. Appellant claims but one proposition of law is raised by the assignments; that is, the force and effect to be given to the workmen’s compulsory compensation act. The question presented and discussed is: When do the provisions of the act become bind*390ing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kleps v. . Bristol Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Proctor v. Rockville Centre Milling & Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API