Kleps v. . Bristol Manufacturing Company
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 3, 1905, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
1Per curiam
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. The Employers’ Liability Act (Chap. 600, Laws 1902) did not provide a remedy for an employee injured in the course of his employment which was exclusive or in abrogation of a right of action at common law. It gave him a right of action for such injury which was in addition to remedies theretofore existing. The complaint in this action contained allegations appropriate to and sufficient for the statement of a cause of action at common law, and especially after the proceedings with reference to the complaint occurring at the commencement of the trial…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gregonis v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Sudbury v. Ambi Verwaltung Kommanditgesselschaft auf AktienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Uss v. Crane Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Hayes v. ComPanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
- Valenti v. MesingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.