Longview Fibre Co. v. Cowlitz County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1DissentAlexander, C.J.
(dissenting) — I dissent because I believe that the majority misinterprets RCW 84.68.020. That statute requires a taxpayer who wishes to challenge an assessment to "pay such tax or any part thereof deemed unlawful, under . . . protest." (Italics mine.) In cases such as this one, where the taxpayer agrees that the tax is valid but challenges the amount, the statute does not clearly require that the entire tax be protested. The provision cited above could readily be interpreted to mean that the taxpayer must protest only that part of the tax to which he or she objects. This interpretation is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ozette Railway Co. v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Duwamish Warehouse Co. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Shurgard Mini-Storage of Tumwater v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Tozer v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Xerox Corporation v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.