Legal Opinion
Filiaci v. Filiaci
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1811We reject plaintiffs further contention that the court abused its discretion in awarding defendant maintenance for a period of six years. Rather, the court should have provided that defendant is entitled to maintenance for a period of six years, until the death of either party, or until defendant’s valid or invalid *1812marriage (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [1] [a]; [6] [c]; McLoughlin v McLoughlin, 63 AD3d 1017, 1018 [2009]; Haines v Haines, 44 AD3d 901, 903 [2007]). We therefore further modify the supplemental judgment accordingly.
We conclude that the court properly awarded defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McLoughlin v. McLoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Haines v. HainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Mulcahy v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Cooper v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Stanley v. HainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- Belkhir v. Amrane-BelkhirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Leonardo v. LeonardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Belkhir v. Amrane-BelkhirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lauzonis v. LauzonisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.