Legal Opinion

Connecticut Savings Bank v. Hanoman Realty Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 3, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.

The plaintiff bank obtained a judgment of strict foreclosure of an open end mortgage which secured the joint and several obligation to it of Hermann S. Cutler, the appellant herein, and of Hanoman Realty Corporation and Milton Hanoman. Upon the motion of the plaintiff, three disinterested appraisers were appointed by the court, and they, under oath, within ten days after the time limited for redemption, appraised the mortgaged property and made a written report thereof to the court as required by General Statutes § 49-14. The court overruled an objection entitled a “remonstrance” * to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. SladeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Buck v. Morris Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. City Sav. Bk of Bridgeport v. MikoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  3. New Haven Savings Bank v. Valley InvestorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Kileen v. General Motors CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1980
  5. New Haven Savings Bank v. Valley InvestorsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API