Legal Opinion
New Haven Savings Bank v. Valley Investors
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 20, 1977PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, J.
The issue here is whether the trial court in a foreclosure action erred in refusing to accept the report of appraisers appointed pursuant to General Statutes § 49-14.1
*79On January 17, 1975, a judgment of strict foreclosure was rendered against the defendants,2 and, upon their failure to redeem, the plaintiff took title to the mortgaged property (a forty unit apartment building in West Haven) on June 13, 1975. The plaintiff sought a deficiency judgment and made a timely motion, pursuant to § 49-14, for the appointment of three disinterested appraisers. The appraisers were duly appointed and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Southern New England Contracting Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. SladeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Silverman v. St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.