Legal Opinion

Garvin v. Bi-Lo, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 2001No. 25245PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Garvin v. Bi-Lo, 337 S.C. 436, 523 S.E.2d 481 (Ct.App.1999). We reverse.

FACTS

The pertinent facts, as set forth by the Court of Appeals, are as follows:

Garvin was shopping at Bi-Lo # 284 in Monck’s Corner when she saw a display of canned items advertised at four for $1.00. The items were stacked in the boxes they had been shipped in, with the tops of the boxes cut off. There were approximately twenty-four cans in each box. According to Garvin, she reached up and took two cans off the top and placed them…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Etheredge v. Richland School District OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Hunter v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Anderson v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Felder Ex Rel. Estate of Felder v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Pennington v. Zayre Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McClanahan Ex Rel. Richland County Landowners & Taxpayers v. Richland County CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Pringle v. SLR, INC. OF SUMMERTONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Nelson v. Piggly Wiggly Central, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Easterling v. Burger King Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016
  5. Kennedy v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API