Legal Opinion

Suggs v. Hale

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 26, 2006No. A05A1662PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge;

Ronald Suggs appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on Steven Hale’s personal injury claim and his own counterclaim for contribution. We granted Suggs’ application for interlocutory appeal and, for reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

We conduct a de novo review of the evidence in an appeal from a ruling on summary judgment. A party is entitled to summary judgment only when no genuine issue of material fact exists and judgment as a matter of law is warranted. In this case, the material facts are not in dispute. Suggs and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fowler v. VineyardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Marchman & Sons, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Krasaeath v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Sunn v. Mercury MarineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Majestic Homes, Inc. v. SIERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zurich American Insurance v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Sanders v. Trinity Universal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Perrett v. SumnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Buce v. FudgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Avatar Industries, LLC v. Innovative Medical Care, Inc. (In Re Innovative Medical Care, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API