Legal Opinion
National City Bank of Rome v. Purdy (In Re Purdy)
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 10, 1981No. Civ. A. C81-129RPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.
The National City Bank of Rome (hereinafter “NCB” or appellant) appeals from an order of the Bankruptcy Court, 10 B.R. 901, rejecting its challenge to the constitutionality and applicability of the $60.00 filing fee presently required to commence an adversary proceeding when seeking relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(d).
As a preliminary matter, the United States, through the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, seeks to intervene in this action. The debtors/appellees have no interest in the outcome of this…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willard v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Donovan v. TMC Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Maritime Asbestosis Legal Clinic v. LTV Steel Co. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re PorterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1984
- Merrill Trust Co. v. Red Barn, Inc. (In Re Red Barn, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.