Brown v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
The post-conviction relief (PCR) judge denied Rafeal Brown’s application for relief holding that, even if counsel was ineffective, Brown failed to establish prejudice. This court granted certiorari to consider whether trial counsel erred in failing to object to a Doyle error at trial. We affirm.
FACTUALIPROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On the night of August 5, 1994, Brown was dancing with a girl inside the Castleblanca Club, a nightclub in Clio. After a male patron passing the pair made what Brown considered to be a threatening gesture, the two began to fight. The fight caused great…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021