Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Farwell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 4, 1964No. 5250PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenison, G.J.

It is argued by Grosvenor Farwell, Jr. that the will evidences a purpose to divide the estate among the heirs as they existed at the death of the life beneficiary, and that this purpose should be effectuated. Kimball v. Lancaster, 60 N. H. 264; Hardy v. Gage, 66 N. H. 552. Reliance is placed in part on item 5 of the will: “If any of my heirs should bring any action at law or in equity against my wife, as Trustee, for any losses or errors of judgment made in good faith, such action brought by or on behalf of any heir shall immediately bar such heir from sharing or receiving any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. ZinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roulac v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. In re Gibb EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API