Legal Opinion

Brittany Etkins v. Dive North Hills, LLC

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01474Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRITTANY ETKINS, 2:24-CV-01474-CCW Plaintiff, v. DIVE NORTH HILLS, LLC, Defendant. OPINION Plaintiff, Brittany Etkins, claims that her former employer, Defendant Dive North Hills, LLC, discriminated against her on the basis of her pregnancy and retaliated against her for engaging in protected activity in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). Ms. Etkins further claims that Dive North Hills failed to make reasonable accommodations for her pregnancy and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API