Legal Opinion

Shearn v. Shearn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

Although this is an action in partition, the sole question presented by this review is dependent upon the interpretation to be placed upon the language of Section 10504-55, General Code.

Alice Hall Shearn died testate, seized of two parcels of real estate. By the terms of her will, parcel one was devised to her surviving consort, Henry Shearn, the plaintiff herein, for life. At his death the remainder over was ordered to be sold and the proceeds of sale divided in certain definite proportions among six named devisees. Parcel two was devised absolutely to Mary Conley Leavengood. Within proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Miners & Mechanics Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Miller v. Miller, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Davis v. Warner, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Estate of Dixon v. DixonWyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Union Commerce Bank v. RothOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Barlow v. Winters National Bank & Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API