Jessie Herbert v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is a typical diversity jurisdiction slip and fall case. The injured plaintiff prevailed but, unsatisfied with the award, appeals, arguing first that the district court erred in refusing to draw an adverse inference with respect to damages from Wal-Mart’s failure to call an expert witness, and second that the court awarded him insufficient damages. Because we hold that the uncalled witness was available to both parties, and because we find that the district court did not err in calculating the damages due, we affirm.
On November 29, 1988, Jessie Herbert, a fifty-seven year old diesel…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Cates v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- IberiaBank v. Darryl BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- King v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- State v. MalaveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.