Legal Opinion

King v. Illinois Central Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2003No. 02-60587PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff, Juddson W. King (King), appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the Defendants, Illinois Central Railroad Company (ICR) and Kenneth Anders (Anders), dismissing all of King’s claims arising out of an automobile-train collision at a railroad crossing. The district court concluded that King failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact with respect to his claims that ICR and the train engineer, Anders, were negligent. After a de novo review, we agree with the district court’s conclusions and, therefore, affirm.

I

This case…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celestine v. Petroleos De Venezuella SACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. 10 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1092, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,203 Mary Vick, Cross-Appellee v. Texas Employment Commission, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Lewis R. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Kane Enterprises v. MacGregor (USA) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Burleson v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. Adkins v. WoleverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Bryant Flury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. CammarataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API