Legal Opinion

Pepin v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 1943No. 4-6949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-ripein Smith, C. J.

Refusal to quash an execution is the error alleged.

In 1930 Hoover procured judgment against Pepin for $1,800 and assigned it to Sam Cochran. Levy on seven pieces of realty was made the same year. At the sale in October Cochran’s bid of $7 was accepted. There the transaction seems to have rested until 1935, when The Midland Savings & Loan Company sued on notes issued to it by Pepin, amounts being more than $13,000. The obligations were secured by mortgages on two of the tracts of land levied on by Cochran. These notes and mortgages, however, were executed in 1929.

A second mortgage to secure…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baum v. LynnMississippi Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Sims v. BestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Williams v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Koontz v. LaDowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  5. Moncrief v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malone v. MaloneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc. v. WilburnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Ingram v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Malone v. MaloneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API