Legal Opinion

Moncrief v. Miller

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 4, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant brought suit at law against appellee to recover the possession of a certain two-acre tract of land upon which there stands a store building and a residence. Appellant claims title to the property through a deed to her from appellee, which she made an exhibit to her complaint. The deed recites that: “I, B. N. Miller, single, for and in consideration of the sum of $1, and the love and affection that I have for Sallie Miller, formerly my wife, do hereby grant, sell and convey unto the said Sallie Miller a life interest in and to the following lands” (describing them). The deed further…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davis v. JerniganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  2. Barnett v. HugheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Sims v. BestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Sutton v. SuttonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Tandy v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Loan & Investment Co. v. NunezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Sewell v. HarkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Pepin v. HooverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. Miller v. MoncriefSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Sewell v. HarkeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API