Legal Opinion

Amanda Lancaster v. Leventhal Lewis Kuhn Taylor Swan, PC, et al.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided November 6, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00108Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA AMANDA LANCASTER, Plaintiff, No. 3:25-cv-00108-HRH vs. LEVENTHAL LEWIS KUHN TAYLOR SWAN, PC, et al., Defendants. ORDER Motions to Dismiss Defendants Leventhal Lewis Kuhn Taylor Swan PC and members of that firm move to dismiss plaintiff Amanda Lancaster’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim.1 Colorado District Court Judge Eric Bentley, an individual defendant, also moves to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and on judicial immunity grounds.2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API