Legal Opinion

State v. Nases

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1982No. 8402PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of theft in the third degree. He appeals, alleging that there was a fatal variance between the charge and the proof and that he was improperly sentenced tó a consecutive term of imprisonment. We affirm.

While appellant was imprisoned at Kulani Honor Camp on the Island of Hawaii, he was in Hilo on work pass. He went into Kalakaua Kleaners in Hilo and took a calculator which was on the counter. Kalakaua Kleaners was a corporation, the stock of which was owned by Setsuko Yokoyama, who was also the manager of the store. Appellant was convicted of third degree theft and was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. PetersHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. RiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. State v. SimpsonNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Commonwealth v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VanstoryHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hosier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
  3. State v. SwordHawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. SanchezHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API