Legal Opinion
Diamond v. latzer
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.
This is an application to have the court declare that an arbitrator appointed in an agreement between the parties is disqualified from acting as such, to declare the *964office vacant and to designate another arbitrator, as well as for some other incidental relief.
The parties formerly conducted a partnership for the practice of law under the name Glatzer, Glatzer & Diamond. The Glatzers are respondents in this proceeding while Diamond is the petitioner. Also joined as a respondent is William S. Evans, a retired Judge of the City Court of New York City, who was associated with the law firm as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & GutwirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp. & Sheila-Lynn, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1939
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Textile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In re the Arbitration between Lipschutz & GutwirthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between Glatzer & DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1959