Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Glatzer & Diamond
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.
This is a motion to confirm an award of arbitration. Respondents herein also move as petitioners under a separate motion to vacate the award pursuant to section 1462 of the Civil Practice Act, charging undue influence and that the arbitrator was disqualified to act, and also requesting the appointment of an impartial arbitrator.
The firm of Glatzer, Glatzer & Diamond dissolved their law partnership pursuant to an agreement which provided for the determination of the respondent Diamond’s share of the dissolved firm’s fees. The agreement dated November 20, 1957, provided…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & GutwirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- In Re the Arbitration Between Amtorg Trading Corp. & Camden Fibre Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Diamond v. latzerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Milliken Woolens, Inc. & Weber Knit Sportswear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- In re the Arbitration between Sociedad Maritima San Nicolas, S. A. & Pangalante Compania Naviera, S. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964