Legal Opinion

Tomlin v. Bickerstaff

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1951No. 33752PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Ground 4 of the amended motion for á new trial assigns error upon the following charge: “If you find for the plaintiff, the form of your verdict would be, ‘We, the jury, find for the plaintiff so many dollars,’ filling in the amount which in this case, as I have previously instructed you, must be an amount not in excess of the amount of $1463.32. And I instruct you, gentlemen, that in view of the pleadings in this case, that would be the only amount which you could find for the plaintiff. In other words, your verdict must be either for the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doonan v. IvesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Gresham v. ConnallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Edge v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Edwards v. Andrews Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Bowie Martin Inc. v. DewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nestle Co. v. JH EWING & SON, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Perimeter Realty v. Gapi, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Christopher Investment Properties, Inc. v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Kraft Land Services, Inc. v. Hart Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Clayton McLendon, Inc. v. Judge & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API