Christopher Investment Properties, Inc. v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Judge.
The trial court granted summary judgment against Patricia Albert, the claimant of a real estate commission, finding that this agent of Christopher Investment Properties, Inc., d/b/a Re/Max, Northwest, was not the “procuring cause” of the sale in question and therefore was not entitled to receive any commission pursuant to the residential sale of “Whitehall.” The court concluded that because Albert was not the procuring cause or a party to any valid contract to sell Whitehall, Albert’s additional claims based on conspiracy and quantum meruit had no validity.
On March 23, 1991,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Foster v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Sharp-Boylston Co. v. LundeenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Moon v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Parrish v. Ragsdale Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Foshee v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McLane v. Atlanta Market Center Management Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Amend v. 485 PropertiesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Killearn Partners, Inc. v. Southeast Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- SCQuARE International, Ltd. v. BBDO Atlanta, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- Insignia/ESG, Inc. v. Reproductive Biology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.