State v. Dominique
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) granting in part John M. Dominique’s motion to suppress evidence obtained inside an intoxilyzer room at the Bar Harbor police station. The State argues that: (1) statements made to the police officer by Dominique while in the room were admissible because they were not the result of interrogation; and (2) statements made by Dominique during a cell phone conversation commenced after the officer left the room, and recorded on a surveillance camera, are also admissible because there was no objective…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fellers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Maine v. Philip FlemingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- State of Maine v. William A. WileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Penkul v. MatarazzoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State v. PrescottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. BraggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.