Legal Opinion

Fellers v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 2004No. 02-6320PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

After a grand jury indicted petitioner John J. Fellers, police officers arrested him at his home. During the course of the arrest, petitioner made several inculpatory statements. He argued that the officers deliberately elicited these statements from him outside the presence of counsel, and that the admission at trial of the fruits of those statements therefore violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Petitioner contends that in rejecting this argument, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit improperly held that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel was “not applicable” because “the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BriggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Donald A. Lehn v. Michael L. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. People v. HugginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. DementCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. United States v. RommyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API