Neukirch v. Wong
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien upon real estate in King county, this state. Service of summons was had upon the nonresident defendants by publication, and, in response thereto, they appeared specially and moved to quash the service. This motion was sustained, because, as it was thought, it was necessary to “attach or sequester” the property upon which the lien was sought to be foreclosed as a condition precedent to the right to get service upon the parties by publication. From this order, the plaintiff appeals.
The first question is whether it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- City Sash & Door Co. v. BunnWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Deming Investment Co. v. ElyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hasek v. Terrene Excavators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986