Legal Opinion

Eastman Oil Mills v. State ex rel. Roberson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22780PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

This suit Avas instituted by the state, on relation of the attorney-general against the Eastman. Oil Mills, a corporation chartered under the laws of this state, and domiciled at Jonestown, Miss., seeking to impose on the defendant the penalties prescribed for a violation of chapter 162, LaAvs of 1911, Hemingway’s Code, section 4750 et seq., and from a decree imposing a penalty of one thousand clol*68lars and forfeiting the defendant’s charter, this appeal was prosecuted.

The bill of complaint avers that the defendant ivas a domestic corporation with its domicile and principal place of business…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fishback v. Globe Casket & Undertaking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Collins v. Cresent Cotton Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. State ex rel. CollinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Tanner v. Northwestern Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Board of Educ. of Lamar County v. HudsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Oktibbeha County Bd. of Educ. v. Town of SturgisMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Reliance Mfg. Co. v. BARR, STATE TAX COMM.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Gift v. LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API