Commonwealth v. Baldasaro

Following his conviction for trafficking in cocaine,1 the defendant appeals, claiming error in the denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in his motel apartment pursuant to a warrant. The defendant maintains that the affidavit submitted in support of the warrant application did not establish probable cause. We conclude otherwise, holding that the affidavit contained “enough information for [the] issuing magistrate to determine that the items *926sought [were] related to the criminal activity under investigation” and “reasonably [could] be expected to be located in the place to be…