Hall v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of murder and his punishment assessed at twenty years confinement in the State penitentiary.
Appellant’s first contention is that the court erred in overruling his application for a continuance on account of the absence of George Senter and Frank Buclcer. As to George Senter, the testimony alleged he would testify to would not have been admissible had he been in attendance on the court. It is not alleged that this witness knew anything about the facts of this case, or any matter leading up to the difficulty, it being alleged only that shortly before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maples v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Sinclair v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Roquemore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Aston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Ex Parte MapleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.