Legal Opinion
Everson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2004No. 02-2028, 02-2033, 02-2084PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Following separate lawsuits by female prisoners in Michigan and by the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Justice, both of which alleged rampant sexual abuse of female prisoners in Michigan, the Michigan Department of Corrections (the “MDOC”) barred males *740from working in certain positions at its female prisons. Specifically, the MDOC designated approximately 250 Correctional Officer (“CO”) and Residential Unit Officer (“RUO”) positions in housing units at female prisons as “female only.” A group of MDOC employees, both males and females, sued…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Breiner v. Nevada Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kohler v. City of WapakonetaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- DeVooght v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- DeVooght v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
- Everson v. Michigan Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.