Legal Opinion

Petrowski v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 26, 1956No. 469PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent, Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company, filed a motion to quash the return of service of summons on the grounds that the District Court acquired no personal jurisdiction over it and that the power of attorney which it had filed with the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of Wisconsin did not authorize him to accept service of process for it in this case. After this motion was denied, respondent filed its answer to the complaint in which it again pressed its claim that the District Court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. Subsequently, however, respondent filed (1) a motion…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. John M. Petrowski v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  3. Carl Thomas Rauch, III v. Day and Night Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. Jose Demelo and Marie Demelo v. Toche Marine, Inc., Woolsey Marine Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Sandra Waite v. AII Acquisition Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API