Legal Opinion
State v. Quick
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 2011No. WD 71058PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR, Judge.
Sean Quick appeals his convictions and associated sentences for first-degree promoting child pornography and possession of child pornography. He claims on appeal that the trial court erred in evidentia-ry rulings and in instructing the jury. The judgment is affirmed.
Facts
Sean Quick was charged with one count of felony promotion of child pornography in the first degree (by offering files through file-sharing) in violation of section 573.025 and two counts of felony possession of child pornography in violation of section 573.037 RSMo 2000. Count I alleged that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Edward LebrunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Missouri Soybean Merchandising Council v. AgBorn Genetics, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Michael Ray Thomas v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. TroyaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Holdeman v. StratmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. StricklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.