Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Veazey

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1994No. 2910450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1351AFTER REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed by the Supreme Court of Alabama, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. Ex parte Veazey, 637 So.2d 1348 (Ala.1993). This ease is now before this court on remand.

The facts in this case are more fully set forth in our original opinion, Roberts v. Veaz-ey, 637 So.2d 1345 (Ala.Civ.App.1992). In that opinion we found the dispositive issue to be whether the trial court erred in failing to find that Roberts was permanently and totally disabled. In reversing the judgment of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Ex Parte VeazeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Tackett v. Elastic Corp. of AmericaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  4. Roberts v. VeazeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norwood v. James River Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. SOLOMON MOTOR CO. v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API