Tatum v. Crescent Laundry Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Pemiscot County Circuit court. — Hon. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.'
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, P. J.
— Judgment for plaintiff for person al injuries and defendant appeals. The action is based on section 7828, Revised Statutes 1909, and alleges that plaintiff was injured by working in defendant’s laundry at Webb City, Mo., by reason of ber clothing being caught by a revolving power shaft; that such shaft was dangerous to workmen, including plaintiff, employed therein, while engaged in their ordinary duties and could and should have been, but was not g'uarded. The answer was a general denial and a plea of contributory negligence.
There is no question as to plaintiff being injured by reason of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Huss v. Heydt Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Dougherty v. Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Simpson v. Witte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- Henderson v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Loyd v. Ozark Electric Cooperative, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Roy v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Mabe Ex Rel. Mabe v. Gille Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
- Guidice v. Viviano & Bros. MacAroni ManufacturingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928