Legal Opinion

BROWNLEE v. SAUL

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00642Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLES E. BROWNLEE, ) . Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:18CV642 ) □ ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Secutity,! ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Charles E. Brownlee (‘Plaintiff’) brought this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), as amended ( 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title Il of the Act.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Hancock v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API