Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentWieand, Judge
The issue in this appeal is whether Pennsylvania law may invalidate fees charged to a credit card holder residing in Pennsylvania, where the credit card was issued by a national bank located in Ohio, under whose law such charges are deemed lawful interest. A majority of the Court, after care*130fully considering this issue, concludes that it is the legislature in Pennsylvania and not the law of the state in which a national bank is located which determines the charges to be made to bank customers who reside in Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, the majority’s decision is contrary to the decisions of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.