Legal Opinion

James H. Rice Co. v. Penn Plate Glass Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 15, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action of assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward P. Yail, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

This is an appeal from a judgment for the sum of $16,595.20, recovered by appellee in an action of assumpsit by it against appellant for damages for breach of contract.

The cause was tried by the court, a jury being waived by agreement of the parties. The nature of the case is fully stated in our opinion in the former appeal, James H. Rice Co. v. Penn Plate Glass Co., 88 Ill. App. 407, and the contract between the parties, for breach of which the suit was brought, is set out in full in that opinion.

Appellee, by contract with appellant of date June 26, 1896, sold to appellant 120,000 square…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Bagley v. FindlayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Brown v. SanbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Clark v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. James H. Rice Co. v. Penn Plate Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wendnagel v. HoustonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API