Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sanborn

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Olmsted county, Mitchell, J., presiding, granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Defendant, in writing, agreed to purchase of plaintiff, at five dollars per ton, the flax straw to be raised from forty-five bushels of flax seed, “ the straw to be delivered in a dry condition, and to be free from grass, weeds, and all foreign substances.” It appearing that there were from twenty to fifty tons of the straw, the agreement was within the seventh section of our Statute-of Frauds, ch. 41, *403'Gen. Stat., since it was a “ contract for the sale of * * goods, chattels, or things in action, for the price of fifty dollars, or more.” It was essentially a contract for the straw, and not,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pratt v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Carpenter v. GallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Thompson v. RobinsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bowers v. WhitneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Heisley v. SwanstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API