Legal Opinion

Buckeye Production Credit, Ass'n v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 17, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-2381 (SS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SPORKIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs contend that the defendant Farm Credit Administration (“FCA”) unlawfully rejected their applications to amend their charters pursuant to sections 2.0 and 2.10 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (“Act”), as amended, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2071(b)(8)(D), 2091(c)(4). Plaintiffs assert that the FCA’s refusal to grant such charter amendments was “arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law ... [or] in excess of statutory jurisdiction [or]…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Buckeye Production Credit Association Federal Land Bank Association of Fostoria, Flca v. The Farm Credit AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. Buckeye Production Credit Ass'n v. Farm Credit AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. Farm Credit Services v. WysockiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1997
  5. County of Genesee v. Greenstone Farm Credit Services, ACADistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API