Blenko v. Schmeltz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linñ;
Plaintiff appeals from the refusal to continue in force a preliminary injunction which had been granted on affidavits pursuant to Equity Eule 38. Unless clear abuse of discretion is shown such orders are affirmed: Trainer v. International Alliance, 353 Pa. 487, 491, 46 A. 2d 463 (1946). In this case: the error is plain. For that reason we granted plaintiff’s pétitioh for a writ of supersedeas. The facts on the merits, as they may be developed on final hearing, are not before'us; we may therefore not at this time enter affinal decree such as appellant suggests is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heasley v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Ass'n, Local No. 31Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Maloney v. U. Mine Workers of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- State ex rel. Waring v. Georgia Medical SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Trainer v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 516Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Manning v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Schlesinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.