Legal Opinion

Blenko v. Schmeltz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1949No. Appeal, 122PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linñ;

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal to continue in force a preliminary injunction which had been granted on affidavits pursuant to Equity Eule 38. Unless clear abuse of discretion is shown such orders are affirmed: Trainer v. International Alliance, 353 Pa. 487, 491, 46 A. 2d 463 (1946). In this case: the error is plain. For that reason we granted plaintiff’s pétitioh for a writ of supersedeas. The facts on the merits, as they may be developed on final hearing, are not before'us; we may therefore not at this time enter affinal decree such as appellant suggests is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heasley v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Ass'n, Local No. 31Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Maloney v. U. Mine Workers of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Waring v. Georgia Medical SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  4. Trainer v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local No. 516Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Manning v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. State Dental Council & Examining Board v. PollockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Schlesinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Berberian v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API