Legal Opinion

Heasley v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Ass'n, Local No. 31

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1936No. Appeal, 191PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

Local No. 31, named as a defendant, is the Pittsburgh unit of an international unincorporated organization known as the Operative Plasterers and Cement Finishers International Association. In June, 1932, it called a strike despite the disapproval of the parent body, and, when it continued in its rebellious attitude, defendant Joseph Mcllveen, a vice-president of the international association as well as a member of the local, was instructed by the International Executive Board to take charge of the situation and reorganize the local union. He i*emoved its officers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maloney v. U. Mine Workers of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kearns v. HowleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Lodge No. 19 v. Svi SvetiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Hutchinson v. GoshornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Kenneck v. PennockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Annenberg v. RobertsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Falcone v. DantinneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API