Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Home Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 7, 1926No. 12078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Justice Purdy.

The defendant appellant insured the residence of the plaintiff respondent in the sum of $1,000. The building was valued in the policy at $12,000, and a total of $8,000 was permitted, and it is admitted that there was the full amount of $8,000 carried on the building — $1,000 by the defendant. The property was damaged by fire. The respondent insisted that her rights were fixed, as to value, by the terms of the policy. The appellant insisted on an appraisal, and the respondent entered mto an appraisal agreement, but the agreement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Real Estate & Trust Co. v. Royal Exchange AssuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Parnell v. Orient Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Division of General Services v. UlmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  3. Ford v. George Washington Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. McInnes v. Southern Home InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Cleveland v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API