Legal Opinion

McInnes v. Southern Home Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1927No. 12330PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

This is an action on an insurance policy.

The facts as we gather them from the record are as follows :

For a period of one year from October 10, 1923, the defendant insurance company insured the plaintiff against all direct loss or damage by tornado, windstorm, or cyclone, to her dwelling house in the city of Charleston, to an amount not exceeding $2,000. The policy contained a provision that, in case the insurer and the insured should disagree as to the amount of any loss or damage, the matter should be submitted to two disinterested…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Continental Ins. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Aiken v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Ford v. George Washington Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ozburn v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Branch v. Springfield Fire Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. Girard v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Cleveland v. Home Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API