Legal Opinion

People v. McCooey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The identification testimony was not the product of an impermissibly suggestive lineup. The County Court’s finding that the lineup was conducted fairly is entitled to great weight and is supported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761). The court’s finding that defendant’s statements were voluntarily made and not taken in violation of his right to counsel is also supported by the record. The arresting officer testified that defendant never requested counsel. Defendant claimed that he did request counsel but could not identify the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. DonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HILL, MILTON, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API