Legal Opinion

Josephson v. Higgins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Sharon Higgins and Lori Vasicek appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered July 24, 1996, as, upon a jury verdict finding the defendant Lori Vasicek 60% at fault in the happening of the incident, the defendant Frank Augustowski 40% at fault, and the plaintiff and the defendant Sharon Higgins not to be at fault, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Lori Vasicek.

*445Ordered that the appeal of the defendant Sharon Higgins is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Goichberg v. SotudehAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Sutter v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. City of New York v. Unsafe Building & Structure Number 147-21 Huxley StreetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Malhotra v. GuptaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrnes v. VarlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Zysk v. BleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Rivera v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API