Legal Opinion
California v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 15, 1958No. 12 ORIGPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
358 U.S. 64 (1958)
CALIFORNIA
v.
WASHINGTON.
No. 12, Original.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15-16, 1958.
Decided November 10, 1958.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT.
Wallace Howland, Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for plaintiff. With him on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and Leonard M. Sperry, Jr., Deputy Attorney General.
John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Thomas R. Garlington argued the cause for defendant. With them on the brief was Franklin K. Thorp, Assistant Attorney General.
Louis J. Lefkowitz,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- California v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ohio v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. HostetterNew York Supreme Court · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.