Legal Opinion
Ohio v. Kentucky
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 1973No. 27 ORIGPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
Almost seven years ago, in March 1966, the State of Ohio instituted this original action against the Commonwealth of Kentucky. By its prayer for relief in its proposed bill of complaint, Ohio asked only that the Court declare and establish:
“1. The boundary line between the State of Ohio and the State of Kentucky as being the low water mark on the northerly side of the Ohio River in the year 1792 ....
“2. The State of Ohio and the State of Kentucky have equal and concurrent jurisdiction over and on all of the Ohio River from the northerly shore to the Southerly shore, except jurisdiction…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. Henderson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Handly's Lessee v. AnthonySupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Alabama v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Nebraska v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kansas v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- California v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.